FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: FOR RELEASE: Cheryl Abbot Thursday, Regional Economist March 6, 2008 (214) 767-6970 http://www.bls.gov/ro6/ CONSUMER SPENDING PATTERNS IN THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN AREA 2005-2006 Consumer units in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas metropolitan area spent an average of $53,294 per year in 2005-2006, according to results from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey. Regional Commissioner Stanley W. Suchman noted that this figure was 12.4 percent higher than the U.S. average household expenditure of $47,421 during the same period. Although local households spent more than the national average, they tended to allocate their dollars similarly among the major categories, differing significantly in only 5 of the 14 categories. (See table 1.) Expenditures for personal insurance and pensions accounted for a significantly larger portion of the total budget in the Dallas area compared to the United States, whereas spending on entertainment represented a significantly smaller-than-average share of the local budget. (See chart A.) Chart A. Percent distribution of total average expenditures for selected categories, United States and Dallas metropolitan area, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2005-2006This report contains annual data averaged over a two-year period, 2005 and 2006. The data are from the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE), which is collected on an ongoing basis by the U.S. Census Bureau for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The Consumer Expenditure Survey is the only national survey that provides both complete data on household expenditures and the demographic characteristics of those households. CE data are available for the nation, the 4 geographic regions of the country, and 18 metropolitan areas. Survey data cannot be used to make cost of living comparisons between areas. Expenditures vary among areas not only because of economic factors such as the prices of goods and services and family income, but also because of differences such as the age of the population, climate, consumer tastes, family size, etc. However, expenditure shares, or the percentage of a consumer units budget spent on a particular category, can be used to compare spending patterns across areas. The survey provides average expenditures for consumer units. An individual consumer unit may spend more or less than the average, depending on its particular characteristics. Though data for 18 metropolitan areas were available for the 2005-06 period, 3 in particularHouston, Miami, and Atlantawere selected for comparison with Dallas, as they were all located in the South and had populations that were similar in size. Housing, the largest expenditure category, accounted for 33.5 percent of a Dallas area households total budget; this share was not significantly different from the 33.3-percent national average. (See table 1.) Houston, at 30.6 percent, had a housing share below that for the United States while housing shares were significantly higher than average in Miami (37.6 percent) and Atlanta (37.0 percent). The majority of housing expenditures in Dallas went toward shelter costs (55.4 percent), which include mortgage interest, property taxes, repairs, and rent, among other items. Nationally, shelter costs accounted for 58.6 percent. (See table A.) Utilities, fuels, and public services expenses accounted for 24.8 percent of total housing expenditures in Dallas, but only 20.9 percent nationwide. At 65 percent, the rate of homeownership in Dallas was below the national average of 67 percent. Homeownership rates were higher than the national average in Houston (70 percent) and Atlanta (69 percent), but lower in Miami (63 percent). (See table 2 for detailed expenditures.) Table A. Percent distribution of housing expenditures, United States and selected metropolitan areas, 2005-2006 ===================================================================================== United Category States Dallas Atlanta Houston Miami ===================================================================================== Total housing 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Shelter 58.6 55.4 59.0 54.8 63.1 Utilities, fuels, and public services 20.9 24.8 23.4 24.3 21.5 Household operations 5.5 6.4 6.1 6.9 5.4 Housekeeping supplies 4.0 4.0 3.4 4.3 3.3 Household furnishings and equipment 11.0 9.5 8.1 9.8 6.7 ===================================================================================== Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding. Transportation, the second-largest expenditure category in the Dallas area at 18.1 percent of local expenditures, was not significantly different from the 17.8-percent national average. Households in Miami (19.3 percent) and Atlanta (17.4 percent) also allocated shares for transportation that were not significantly different from that for the nation. However, Houston consumer units spent a measurably larger share on transportation (20.7 percent). In fact, Houston was the only area with an above-average transportation share among the 18 published metropolitan areas nationwide. Of the annual $9,662 transportation expenditure in Dallas, 94.6 percent was used in buying and maintaining private vehicles, similar to the national average of 94.4 percent. (See table B for expenditure shares and table 2 for detailed expenditure levels.) The average number of vehicles per household in Dallas was 2.0, close to the national average of 1.9. The average number of vehicles per household was equal to the U.S. average in Houston (1.9), but below the average in Atlanta (1.6) and Miami (1.5). In the Dallas area, 5.4 percent of the household transportation budget was spent on public transit, which includes fares for taxis, buses, trains, and planes; nationally, the average was 5.6 percent. Table B. Percent distribution of transportation expenditures, United States and selected metropolitan areas, 2005-2006 ================================================================================ United Category States Dallas Atlanta Houston Miami ================================================================================ Total transportation 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Vehicle purchases (net outlays) 41.3 40.6 41.4 45.6 39.1 Gasoline and motor oil 25.2 24.9 28.0 23.6 25.3 Other vehicle expenses 27.9 29.1 25.9 26.4 30.3 Public transportation 5.6 5.4 4.8 4.5 5.3 ================================================================================ Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding. Payments for personal insurance and pensions averaged $6,573 in Dallas and accounted for 12.3 percent of the local household expenditures, significantly higher than the 11.0-percent share allocated nationally. Atlanta, too, had an above-average share at 12.8 percent for these types of payments, while Houstons 11.5-percent share was not significantly different from the national average. Consumer units in Miami (9.4 percent) allocated a smaller-than- average portion of their budget to personal insurance and pensions. On an annual basis, Dallas households spent $6,537 on food, which accounted for a 12.3-percent share of their expenditures, matching the percentage they allocated to personal insurance and pensions. This percentage was not significantly different from the 12.7-percent share for food recorded nationally. Consumer units in Miami (13.3 percent) and Atlanta (12.1 percent) also had expenditures shares similar to that of the nation, but households in Houston (10.8 percent) spent a significantly smaller portion of their budget on food. Consumer units in Dallas allocated 54.7 percent of their food dollars on food prepared at home and the remaining 45.3 percent on food prepared away from home, such as restaurant meals, carry-outs, board at school, and catered meals. The expenditure share allocated to food prepared at home was close to the 55.7 percent average spent by U.S. households. Among the three other selected southern metropolitan areas, Houston (53.3 percent) and Atlanta (47.4 percent) allocated a measurably smaller share of their budgets to eating at home while residents of Miami (63.7 percent) spent a significantly higher share on food at home. Out-of-pocket healthcare expenseswhich include health insurance premiums, medical services, drugs (prescription and nonprescription), and medical care suppliesaccounted for 5.8 percent of total household expenditures in both Dallas and Houston, not significantly different from the 5.7-percent share recorded nationwide. However, the percentage spent on out-of-pocket health care expenses was significantly less than the national average in both Miami (5.2 percent) and Atlanta (4.6 percent). A typical Dallas area household allocated a significantly lower share (4.3 percent) of its budget to entertainment expenditures when compared to the national average (5.0 percent). Consumer units in Houston (4.5 percent) and Miami (3.6 percent) also spent lower portions of their total budgets on entertainment, while those in Atlanta had an expenditure share not significantly different from the U.S. average. Cash contributions accounted for 3.9 percent of an average consumer units spending in Dallas, similar to the national average of 3.7 percent. This category consists of cash contributed to persons or organizations outside the consumer unit, including alimony and child support payments; care of students away from home; and contributions to religious, educational, charitable, or political organizations. The expenditure share for cash contributions was also not significantly different from that for the nation in Houston, but was lower than average in Miami (3.1 percent) and Atlanta (2.8 percent). Spending on apparel and services accounted for 3.8 percent of total expenditures in Dallas, not significantly different from the 4.0-percent national average. Households in Houston (4.6 percent) and Atlanta (4.2 percent) allocated a similar share of their total budgets for clothing when compared to the typical U.S. household, while the expenditure share in Miami (2.9 percent) was significantly lower than the U.S. average. As noted, the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area is 1 of 18 areas nationwide for which Consumer Expenditure data are available. We encourage users interested in learning more about the Consumer Expenditure Survey to contact the Southwest Information Office at (214) 767-6970. Metropolitan area CE data and that for the four geographic regions and the United States are available on the BLS Web site at http://www.bls.gov/cex/. This release is available in text and PDF format on the Dallas BLS Web site at http://www.bls.gov/ro6/ . Technical Note The current Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) program began in 1980. Its principal objective is to collect information on the buying habits of American consumers. The consumer expenditure data are used in a wide variety of research by government, business, labor, and academic analysts. The data are also required for periodic revision of the Consumer Price Index. The survey consists of two components, a diary or recordkeeping survey, and an interview survey. The Diary Survey, completed by participating consumer units for two consecutive 1-week periods, collects data on frequently-purchased smaller items. The Interview Survey, in which the expenditures of consumer units are obtained in five interviews conducted every 3 months, collects data for larger-cost items and expenditures that occur on a regular basis. The U.S. Census Bureau collects the survey data. Each component of the survey queries an independent sample of consumer units which is representative of the U.S. population. Over the year, about 7,000 consumer units are sampled for the Diary Survey. The Interview Survey is conducted on a rotating panel basis, with about 7,000 consumer units participating each quarter. The data are collected on an ongoing basis in 91 areas of the country. The integrated data from the BLS Diary and Interview Surveys provide a complete accounting of consumer expenditures and income, which neither survey component alone is designed to do. The expenditure data in this release should be interpreted with care. The expenditures are averages for consumer units with the specified characteristics, regardless of whether or not a specific unit incurred an expense for that specific item during the recording period. The average expenditure may be considerably lower than the expenditure by those consumer units that purchased the item. This study is not intended as a comparative cost of living survey, as neither the quantity nor the quality of goods and services has been held constant among areas. Differences may result from variations in demographic characteristics such as consumer unit size, age, preferences, income levels, etc. Users should keep in mind that prices for many goods and services have risen since the survey was conducted. In addition, sample surveys are subject to two types of errors. Sampling errors occur because the data are collected from a representative sample rather than the entire population. Nonsampling errors result from the inability or unwillingness of respondents to provide correct information, differences in interviewer ability, mistakes in recording or coding, or other processing errors. The year-to-year changes are volatile and should be interpreted carefully. Sample sizes for the metropolitan areas are much smaller than for the nation, so the U.S. estimates and year-to-year changes are more reliable than those for the metropolitan areas. Some expenditure components are subject to large fluctuations from one year to the next because these components include expensive items that relatively few consumers purchase each year. Thus, shifts from year to year in the number of consumers making such purchases can have a large effect on average expenditures. Examples of these types of expenses are purchases of new cars and trucks in the transportation component, and spending on boats and recreational vehicles in the entertainment component. The CE significance tests in this release compare expenditure shares for the 14 major expenditure categories in the United States to expenditure shares in selected metropolitan areas (areas in this release are listed below). Expenditure shares for housing and transportation that are above or below that for the nation after testing for significance at the 95-percent confidence interval are identified in charts 1 and 2 for the 18 metropolitan areas surveyed. NOTE: A value that is statistically different from another does not necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance. Statistical significance is concerned with our ability to make confident statements about a universe based on a sample. It is entirely possible that a large difference between two values is not significantly different statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested. Metropolitan areas definitions are based on Core-Based Statistical Areas defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. The metropolitan areas and their component counties and cities discussed in this release are: Atlanta, Ga. -- Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Pickens, Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton Counties. Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas -- includes Collin, Dallas, Delta, Denton, Ellis, Henderson, Hood, Hunt, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant and Wise Counties. Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, Texas -- includes Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery, San Jacinto and Waller Counties. Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Fla. -- includes Broward and Miami Dade Counties. Definitions Consumer unit - members of a household related by blood, marriage, adoption, or other legal arrangement; a single person living alone or sharing a household with others but who is financially independent; or two or more persons living together who share responsibility for at least 2 out of 3 major types of expenses - food, housing, and other expenses. The terms household or consumer unit are used interchangeably for convenience. Expenditures - consist of the transaction costs, including excise and sales taxes, of goods and services acquired during the interview or recordkeeping period. Expenditure estimates include expenditures for gifts, but exclude purchases or portions of purchases directly assignable to business purposes. Also excluded are periodic credit or installment payments on goods or services already acquired. The full cost of each purchase is recorded even though full payment may not have been made at the date of purchase. Income before taxes - the total money earnings and selected money receipts during the 12 months prior to the interview date. =================================================================================== (1) See Technical Note for definition of a consumer unit. The terms consumer unit and household are used interchangeably throughout this text for convenience. (2) Statistical significance tests were introduced for metropolitan area expenditure shares beginning with 2004-2005 data. See Technical Note for further discussion of Consumer Expenditure significance testing. =================================================================================== Table 1. Consumer unit characteristics and percent distribution of expenditures, U.S. and selected metropolitan statistical areas, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2005-2006 =============================================================================== United Item States Dallas Atlanta Houston Miami =============================================================================== Consumer unit characteristics: Income before taxes $59,628 $66,261 $64,217 $68,659 $51,232 Age of reference person 48.7 44.9 46.1 45.7 50.4 Average number in consumer unit: Persons 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.5 Children under 18 .6 .8 .7 .8 .6 Persons 65 and over .3 .2 .2 .2 .4 Earners 1.3 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.3 Vehicles 1.9 2.0 1.6 1.9 1.5 Percent homeowner 67 65 69 70 63 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average annual expenditures $47,421 $53,294 $43,727 $56,260 $42,379 Percent distribution: 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Food 12.7 12.3 12.1 10.8 13.3 Alcoholic beverages 1.0 .9 .6 1.1 .6 Housing 33.3 33.5 37.0 30.6 37.6 Apparel and services 4.0 3.8 4.2 4.6 2.9 Transportation 17.8 18.1 17.4 20.7 19.3 Healthcare 5.7 5.8 4.6 5.8 5.2 Entertainment 5.0 4.3 4.3 4.5 3.6 Personal care products & services 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.5 Reading .3 .2 .2 .2 .1 Education 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.7 Tobacco products & smoking supplies .7 .5 .4 .5 .4 Miscellaneous 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.2 Cash contributions 3.7 3.9 2.8 4.9 3.1 Personal insurance and pensions 11.0 12.3 12.8 11.5 9.4 =============================================================================== NOTE: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding. Table 2. Consumer unit characteristics and average annual expenditures, U.S. and selected metropolitan areas, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2005-2006 ================================================================================== United Item States Dallas Atlanta Houston Miami ================================================================================== Average annual expenditures $47,421 $53,294 $43,727 $56,260 $42,379 Food 6,022 6,537 5,289 6,063 5,637 Food at home 3,357 3,573 2,506 3,231 3,593 Cereals and bakery products 446 468 323 382 464 Meats, poultry, fish, & eggs 781 805 661 784 910 Dairy products 373 392 234 329 427 Fruits and vegetables 572 596 443 587 727 Other food at home 1,185 1,312 846 1,149 1,066 Food away from home 2,665 2,964 2,783 2,832 2,044 Alcoholic beverages 462 461 265 604 255 Housing 15,782 17,854 16,158 17,198 15,928 Shelter 9,253 9,883 9,539 9,427 10,053 Owned dwellings 6,250 6,793 6,467 6,501 6,385 Rented dwellings 2,468 2,478 2,523 2,293 3,445 Other lodging 535 611 549 634 222 Utilities, fuels, & public services 3,291 4,424 3,773 4,179 3,421 Household operations 875 1,140 990 1,181 856 Housekeeping supplies 625 714 548 732 532 Household furnishings & equipment 1,737 1,693 1,307 1,679 1,065 Apparel and services 1,880 2,048 1,847 2,608 1,242 Transportation 8,427 9,662 7,599 11,636 8,186 Vehicle purchases (net outlay) 3,482 3,919 3,146 5,305 3,199 Gasoline and motor oil 2,121 2,410 2,124 2,743 2,069 Other vehicle expenses 2,347 2,816 1,965 3,068 2,480 Public transportation 476 517 364 519 437 Healthcare 2,716 3,075 2,017 3,259 2,190 Entertainment 2,382 2,285 1,861 2,528 1,523 Personal care products & services 563 713 460 737 633 Reading 122 110 72 114 43 Education 914 799 652 998 724 Tobacco products & smoking supplies 323 260 190 274 168 Miscellaneous 827 839 522 1,025 524 Cash contributions 1,767 2,077 1,207 2,736 1,328 Personal insurance and pensions 5,237 6,573 5,587 6,478 4,000 Life & other personal insurance 351 382 266 441 221 Pensions and Social Security 4,886 6,191 5,321 6,038 3,779 ==================================================================================
Last Modified Date: March 6, 2008

This report contains annual data averaged over a two-year period, 2005 and
2006. The data are from the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE), which is
collected on an ongoing basis by the U.S. Census Bureau for the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS). The Consumer Expenditure Survey is the only national survey
that provides both complete data on household expenditures and the demographic
characteristics of those households. CE data are available for the nation, the
4 geographic regions of the country, and 18 metropolitan areas. Survey data
cannot be used to make cost of living comparisons between areas. Expenditures
vary among areas not only because of economic factors such as the prices of
goods and services and family income, but also because of differences such as
the age of the population, climate, consumer tastes, family size, etc.
However, expenditure shares, or the percentage of a consumer units budget
spent on a particular category, can be used to compare spending patterns across
areas. The survey provides average expenditures for consumer units. An
individual consumer unit may spend more or less than the average, depending on
its particular characteristics.
Though data for 18 metropolitan areas were available for the 2005-06
period, 3 in particularHouston, Miami, and Atlantawere selected for
comparison with Dallas, as they were all located in the South and had
populations that were similar in size.
Housing, the largest expenditure category, accounted for 33.5 percent of a
Dallas area households total budget; this share was not significantly
different from the 33.3-percent national average. (See table 1.) Houston, at
30.6 percent, had a housing share below that for the United States while
housing shares were significantly higher than average in Miami (37.6 percent)
and Atlanta (37.0 percent).
The majority of housing expenditures in Dallas went toward shelter costs
(55.4 percent), which include mortgage interest, property taxes, repairs, and
rent, among other items. Nationally, shelter costs accounted for 58.6 percent.
(See table A.) Utilities, fuels, and public services expenses accounted for
24.8 percent of total housing expenditures in Dallas, but only 20.9 percent
nationwide. At 65 percent, the rate of homeownership in Dallas was below the
national average of 67 percent. Homeownership rates were higher than the
national average in Houston (70 percent) and Atlanta (69 percent), but lower in
Miami (63 percent). (See table 2 for detailed expenditures.)
Table A. Percent distribution of housing expenditures, United States and selected
metropolitan areas, 2005-2006
=====================================================================================
United
Category States Dallas Atlanta Houston Miami
=====================================================================================
Total housing 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Shelter 58.6 55.4 59.0 54.8 63.1
Utilities, fuels, and public services 20.9 24.8 23.4 24.3 21.5
Household operations 5.5 6.4 6.1 6.9 5.4
Housekeeping supplies 4.0 4.0 3.4 4.3 3.3
Household furnishings and equipment 11.0 9.5 8.1 9.8 6.7
=====================================================================================
Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.
Transportation, the second-largest expenditure category in the Dallas area
at 18.1 percent of local expenditures, was not significantly different from the
17.8-percent national average. Households in Miami (19.3 percent) and Atlanta
(17.4 percent) also allocated shares for transportation that were not
significantly different from that for the nation. However, Houston consumer
units spent a measurably larger share on transportation (20.7 percent). In
fact, Houston was the only area with an above-average transportation share
among the 18 published metropolitan areas nationwide.
Of the annual $9,662 transportation expenditure in Dallas, 94.6 percent
was used in buying and maintaining private vehicles, similar to the national
average of 94.4 percent. (See table B for expenditure shares and table 2 for
detailed expenditure levels.) The average number of vehicles per household in
Dallas was 2.0, close to the national average of 1.9. The average number of
vehicles per household was equal to the U.S. average in Houston (1.9), but
below the average in Atlanta (1.6) and Miami (1.5). In the Dallas area, 5.4
percent of the household transportation budget was spent on public transit,
which includes fares for taxis, buses, trains, and planes; nationally, the
average was 5.6 percent.
Table B. Percent distribution of transportation expenditures, United States and
selected metropolitan areas, 2005-2006
================================================================================
United
Category States Dallas Atlanta Houston Miami
================================================================================
Total transportation 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Vehicle purchases (net outlays) 41.3 40.6 41.4 45.6 39.1
Gasoline and motor oil 25.2 24.9 28.0 23.6 25.3
Other vehicle expenses 27.9 29.1 25.9 26.4 30.3
Public transportation 5.6 5.4 4.8 4.5 5.3
================================================================================
Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.
Payments for personal insurance and pensions averaged $6,573 in Dallas and
accounted for 12.3 percent of the local household expenditures, significantly
higher than the 11.0-percent share allocated nationally. Atlanta, too, had an
above-average share at 12.8 percent for these types of payments, while
Houstons 11.5-percent share was not significantly different from the national
average. Consumer units in Miami (9.4 percent) allocated a smaller-than-
average portion of their budget to personal insurance and pensions.
On an annual basis, Dallas households spent $6,537 on food, which
accounted for a 12.3-percent share of their expenditures, matching the
percentage they allocated to personal insurance and pensions. This percentage
was not significantly different from the 12.7-percent share for food recorded
nationally. Consumer units in Miami (13.3 percent) and Atlanta (12.1 percent)
also had expenditures shares similar to that of the nation, but households in
Houston (10.8 percent) spent a significantly smaller portion of their budget on
food.
Consumer units in Dallas allocated 54.7 percent of their food dollars on
food prepared at home and the remaining 45.3 percent on food prepared away from
home, such as restaurant meals, carry-outs, board at school, and catered meals.
The expenditure share allocated to food prepared at home was close to the 55.7
percent average spent by U.S. households. Among the three other selected
southern metropolitan areas, Houston (53.3 percent) and Atlanta (47.4 percent)
allocated a measurably smaller share of their budgets to eating at home while
residents of Miami (63.7 percent) spent a significantly higher share on food at
home.
Out-of-pocket healthcare expenseswhich include health insurance premiums,
medical services, drugs (prescription and nonprescription), and medical care
suppliesaccounted for 5.8 percent of total household expenditures in both
Dallas and Houston, not significantly different from the 5.7-percent share
recorded nationwide. However, the percentage spent on out-of-pocket health
care expenses was significantly less than the national average in both Miami
(5.2 percent) and Atlanta (4.6 percent).
A typical Dallas area household allocated a significantly lower share (4.3
percent) of its budget to entertainment expenditures when compared to the
national average (5.0 percent). Consumer units in Houston (4.5 percent) and
Miami (3.6 percent) also spent lower portions of their total budgets on
entertainment, while those in Atlanta had an expenditure share not
significantly different from the U.S. average.
Cash contributions accounted for 3.9 percent of an average consumer units
spending in Dallas, similar to the national average of 3.7 percent. This
category consists of cash contributed to persons or organizations outside the
consumer unit, including alimony and child support payments; care of students
away from home; and contributions to religious, educational, charitable, or
political organizations. The expenditure share for cash contributions was also
not significantly different from that for the nation in Houston, but was lower
than average in Miami (3.1 percent) and Atlanta (2.8 percent).
Spending on apparel and services accounted for 3.8 percent of total
expenditures in Dallas, not significantly different from the 4.0-percent
national average. Households in Houston (4.6 percent) and Atlanta (4.2
percent) allocated a similar share of their total budgets for clothing when
compared to the typical U.S. household, while the expenditure share in Miami
(2.9 percent) was significantly lower than the U.S. average.
As noted, the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area is 1 of 18 areas
nationwide for which Consumer Expenditure data are available. We encourage
users interested in learning more about the Consumer Expenditure Survey to
contact the Southwest Information Office at (214) 767-6970. Metropolitan area
CE data and that for the four geographic regions and the United States are
available on the BLS Web site at http://www.bls.gov/cex/. This release
is available in text and PDF format on the Dallas BLS Web site at
http://www.bls.gov/ro6/ .
Technical Note
The current Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) program began in 1980. Its
principal objective is to collect information on the buying habits of American
consumers. The consumer expenditure data are used in a wide variety of
research by government, business, labor, and academic analysts. The data are
also required for periodic revision of the Consumer Price Index.
The survey consists of two components, a diary or recordkeeping survey,
and an interview survey. The Diary Survey, completed by participating consumer
units for two consecutive 1-week periods, collects data on frequently-purchased
smaller items. The Interview Survey, in which the expenditures of consumer
units are obtained in five interviews conducted every 3 months, collects data
for larger-cost items and expenditures that occur on a regular basis. The U.S.
Census Bureau collects the survey data.
Each component of the survey queries an independent sample of consumer
units which is representative of the U.S. population. Over the year, about
7,000 consumer units are sampled for the Diary Survey. The Interview Survey is
conducted on a rotating panel basis, with about 7,000 consumer units
participating each quarter. The data are collected on an ongoing basis in 91
areas of the country.
The integrated data from the BLS Diary and Interview Surveys provide a
complete accounting of consumer expenditures and income, which neither survey
component alone is designed to do.
The expenditure data in this release should be interpreted with care. The
expenditures are averages for consumer units with the specified
characteristics, regardless of whether or not a specific unit incurred an
expense for that specific item during the recording period. The average
expenditure may be considerably lower than the expenditure by those consumer
units that purchased the item. This study is not intended as a comparative
cost of living survey, as neither the quantity nor the quality of goods and
services has been held constant among areas. Differences may result from
variations in demographic characteristics such as consumer unit size, age,
preferences, income levels, etc. Users should keep in mind that prices for
many goods and services have risen since the survey was conducted.
In addition, sample surveys are subject to two types of errors. Sampling
errors occur because the data are collected from a representative sample rather
than the entire population. Nonsampling errors result from the inability or
unwillingness of respondents to provide correct information, differences in
interviewer ability, mistakes in recording or coding, or other processing
errors. The year-to-year changes are volatile and should be interpreted
carefully. Sample sizes for the metropolitan areas are much smaller than for
the nation, so the U.S. estimates and year-to-year changes are more reliable
than those for the metropolitan areas.
Some expenditure components are subject to large fluctuations from one
year to the next because these components include expensive items that
relatively few consumers purchase each year. Thus, shifts from year to year in
the number of consumers making such purchases can have a large effect on
average expenditures. Examples of these types of expenses are purchases of new
cars and trucks in the transportation component, and spending on boats and
recreational vehicles in the entertainment component.
The CE significance tests in this release compare expenditure shares for
the 14 major expenditure categories in the United States to expenditure shares
in selected metropolitan areas (areas in this release are listed below).
Expenditure shares for housing and transportation that are above or below that
for the nation after testing for significance at the 95-percent confidence
interval are identified in charts 1 and 2 for the 18 metropolitan areas
surveyed.
NOTE: A value that is statistically different from another does not
necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance.
Statistical significance is concerned with our ability to make confident
statements about a universe based on a sample. It is entirely possible that a
large difference between two values is not significantly different
statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and
heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested.
Metropolitan areas definitions are based on Core-Based Statistical Areas
defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. The metropolitan areas
and their component counties and cities discussed in this release are:
Atlanta, Ga. -- Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta,
DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding,
Pickens, Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton Counties.
Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas -- includes Collin, Dallas, Delta, Denton, Ellis,
Henderson, Hood, Hunt, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant and Wise
Counties.
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, Texas -- includes Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend,
Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery, San Jacinto and Waller Counties.
Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Fla. -- includes Broward and Miami Dade Counties.
Definitions
Consumer unit - members of a household related by blood, marriage, adoption,
or other legal arrangement; a single person living alone or sharing a household
with others but who is financially independent; or two or more persons living
together who share responsibility for at least 2 out of 3 major types of
expenses - food, housing, and other expenses. The terms household or consumer
unit are used interchangeably for convenience.
Expenditures - consist of the transaction costs, including excise and sales
taxes, of goods and services acquired during the interview or recordkeeping
period. Expenditure estimates include expenditures for gifts, but exclude
purchases or portions of purchases directly assignable to business purposes.
Also excluded are periodic credit or installment payments on goods or services
already acquired. The full cost of each purchase is recorded even though full
payment may not have been made at the date of purchase.
Income before taxes - the total money earnings and selected money receipts
during the 12 months prior to the interview date.
===================================================================================
(1) See Technical Note for definition of a consumer unit. The terms consumer
unit and household are used interchangeably throughout this text for convenience.
(2) Statistical significance tests were introduced for metropolitan area
expenditure shares beginning with 2004-2005 data. See Technical Note for further
discussion of Consumer Expenditure significance testing.
===================================================================================
Table 1. Consumer unit characteristics and percent distribution of
expenditures, U.S. and selected metropolitan statistical areas, Consumer
Expenditure Survey, 2005-2006
===============================================================================
United
Item States Dallas Atlanta Houston Miami
===============================================================================
Consumer unit characteristics:
Income before taxes $59,628 $66,261 $64,217 $68,659 $51,232
Age of reference person 48.7 44.9 46.1 45.7 50.4
Average number in consumer unit:
Persons 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.5
Children under 18 .6 .8 .7 .8 .6
Persons 65 and over .3 .2 .2 .2 .4
Earners 1.3 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.3
Vehicles 1.9 2.0 1.6 1.9 1.5
Percent homeowner 67 65 69 70 63
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average annual expenditures $47,421 $53,294 $43,727 $56,260 $42,379
Percent distribution: 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Food 12.7 12.3 12.1 10.8 13.3
Alcoholic beverages 1.0 .9 .6 1.1 .6
Housing 33.3 33.5 37.0 30.6 37.6
Apparel and services 4.0 3.8 4.2 4.6 2.9
Transportation 17.8 18.1 17.4 20.7 19.3
Healthcare 5.7 5.8 4.6 5.8 5.2
Entertainment 5.0 4.3 4.3 4.5 3.6
Personal care products & services 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.5
Reading .3 .2 .2 .2 .1
Education 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.7
Tobacco products & smoking supplies .7 .5 .4 .5 .4
Miscellaneous 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.2
Cash contributions 3.7 3.9 2.8 4.9 3.1
Personal insurance and pensions 11.0 12.3 12.8 11.5 9.4
===============================================================================
NOTE: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.
Table 2. Consumer unit characteristics and average annual expenditures,
U.S. and selected metropolitan areas, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2005-2006
==================================================================================
United
Item States Dallas Atlanta Houston Miami
==================================================================================
Average annual expenditures $47,421 $53,294 $43,727 $56,260 $42,379
Food 6,022 6,537 5,289 6,063 5,637
Food at home 3,357 3,573 2,506 3,231 3,593
Cereals and bakery products 446 468 323 382 464
Meats, poultry, fish, & eggs 781 805 661 784 910
Dairy products 373 392 234 329 427
Fruits and vegetables 572 596 443 587 727
Other food at home 1,185 1,312 846 1,149 1,066
Food away from home 2,665 2,964 2,783 2,832 2,044
Alcoholic beverages 462 461 265 604 255
Housing 15,782 17,854 16,158 17,198 15,928
Shelter 9,253 9,883 9,539 9,427 10,053
Owned dwellings 6,250 6,793 6,467 6,501 6,385
Rented dwellings 2,468 2,478 2,523 2,293 3,445
Other lodging 535 611 549 634 222
Utilities, fuels, & public services 3,291 4,424 3,773 4,179 3,421
Household operations 875 1,140 990 1,181 856
Housekeeping supplies 625 714 548 732 532
Household furnishings & equipment 1,737 1,693 1,307 1,679 1,065
Apparel and services 1,880 2,048 1,847 2,608 1,242
Transportation 8,427 9,662 7,599 11,636 8,186
Vehicle purchases (net outlay) 3,482 3,919 3,146 5,305 3,199
Gasoline and motor oil 2,121 2,410 2,124 2,743 2,069
Other vehicle expenses 2,347 2,816 1,965 3,068 2,480
Public transportation 476 517 364 519 437
Healthcare 2,716 3,075 2,017 3,259 2,190
Entertainment 2,382 2,285 1,861 2,528 1,523
Personal care products & services 563 713 460 737 633
Reading 122 110 72 114 43
Education 914 799 652 998 724
Tobacco products & smoking supplies 323 260 190 274 168
Miscellaneous 827 839 522 1,025 524
Cash contributions 1,767 2,077 1,207 2,736 1,328
Personal insurance and pensions 5,237 6,573 5,587 6,478 4,000
Life & other personal insurance 351 382 266 441 221
Pensions and Social Security 4,886 6,191 5,321 6,038 3,779
==================================================================================